The delay in
the execution of the agro processing centre projects across the country has
been attributed to the disappearance of contractors and the disagreement between
investors, contractors and equipment fabricators over the use of substandard
materials by the fabricators. This was revealed during the meeting of the
stakeholders held in Abuja.
Speaking at
the meeting the Director, Project Coordinating Unit (PCU), Federal Ministry of
Agriculture and Rural Development (FMARD) Dr. Maimuna Habib, said that the
meeting was necessary because of the disagreement between the investors,
contractors and the fabricators, which was exposed during the visit of the PCU
team to the 36 states, where only 13 was said to be completed but yet to be
commissioned.
She
explained that the abandonment of the agro processing centres’ projects across
the country was tied to investors rejecting most of the equipments supplied by
the fabricator due to their poor quality.
She also pointed out that even though the
project funded by the Bank of Industry (BOI) was awarded in 2010, and that as
stated in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed by FMARD and BOI, the
project was to be completed in six months, but which inadvertently had dragged
until the point that most of the contractors had abandoned most of the projects,
with many of them being vandalised.
The PCU
director disclosed that there might be a deliberate delay, as contractors,
investor and fabricators were having issues within themselves, adding that if
the project needed to work it has to be looked at holistically.
Engineer
Hassan Bawa in charge of the Agro Processing Centre Project under the NPFS/PCU
said that case of the abandoned projects across the country was pathetic as
many of the contractors had absconded after civil work and equipment payment,
which were never used to complete the project leaving most of the projects damaged
by the rain, as most of the centres are situated in rainy environment.
Bawa
disclosed that the death of some of the investors had also affected most of the
projects’ continuity, as many of the contractors are not willing to return to
the project sites unless there was an upward review of the contract sum by the
government.
He added
that the bank of industry had also called on the bank of industry to bring the
tedious terms of the MOU, to what is workable.
The
Representative of the investors Mr. Peter Dama, said that there were those that
their projects were completed and there were those whose projects were still
lingering, “and in as much as the project was still ongoing, we feel that there
should be a review of the contract, as the project is written and reviewed
since 2010, and looking at the fact that most of us might not have the money to
continue or complete the project, otherwise we continue moving without
destination.”
He complained
that the technologies used were of poor standards “and that is why some of the
equipment produced was not accepted by the investors” and that the biggest
challenge was energy which had resulted in the delay of production, stressing
that the disparity in terms of subsidy given to the big rice farmers should
also be given to the small millers who are integrated rice millers, as
smuggling is also a major problem for not just rice producers but to also other
value chains.
He pointed
out that the issue of the subsidy of the CBN, should also include the babies of
the FMARD to be able to access the fund so that they can meet up with the
market competition.
Dama
stressed that the issue of bureaucracy should be reduced as there should also
be off takers for some of the produce on ground.
Also
speaking at the event, the representative of the contractor who showed pictures
to prove that the project was completed said that the contractor was short-paid
by one million naira in addition to the delay in his payment by BOI, saying
that he had to remove some of the equipment, so that they would not be
vandalised.
Chief
Patrick Emako from Abia State said that their own factory had been completed
with detailed information and pictures to show, adding that they have also
commenced processing of oil palm in the factory, but that the business was
presently experiencing price instability as they produce high and sell below
their production cost.
He said that
the way forward was for the federal government to subsidize, buy from the oil
palm processors, keep, then sell, back to the farmers when the produce is on
sales by November, December adding that they can also be given cash as a form
of subsidy.
Another
investor from Nassarawa state Mr. Mark Awenegiemel pointed that the civil and
equipment installation of his cassava processing centre has been completed
100%, but that it was sad that after test-running of the facility it was
noticed “that the equipments used in the building and installation were nothing
to write home about and would not yield much as we are expected to pay back the
loans called, as the environment is not favourable.”
He suggested that the engineering aspect of
the cassava project could be “redesigned so that we can be competitive as we
spend more money than the local processors.”
He stated that due to the short fall of the
cost, from the inception, the amount allocated for the project was not enough:
“when the project was awarded the price of so many things had not gone up, but
now, they have gone up and the project needs money.”
The
representative of the Bank of Industry (BOI) Mr. Kabir Salaudine Abudrahuf
disclosed that the bank had completed disbursement to the states leaving
everyone of them to their various contract.
He denied
the report that the bank was slow in issuing out funds, saying that “we have to
recover the loans out, do internal checks, proper documentations, CBN
regulation and the international financial regulations’, and if request come we
process as quick as possible.”
He added
that the bank could not go out of the mandate given it in the MoU, lamenting
the incomplete documents paraded by the contractors and stressed that as soon
as the documents were in place the loans will be issued out.
Very surprising but also very shameful that projects that ought to have been completed in 6 months in 2010 are being inspected in 2019. This is abusing our collective sensibilities.
ReplyDelete