A research maize field. |
Parliament on
Wednesday began scrutinizing the Biotechnology and Biosafety Bill 2012,
which has been on the shelves for more than three years.
The bill was first
tabled in parliament in 2013 by then minister of state in charge of
Planning Matia Kasaija. Its introduction drew both praise and sharp
criticism from people against the introduction of genetically modified
organisms (GMOs) in the country.
While proponents of
the bill believe that once passed, the already developed varieties of
food crops that are drought-resistant will be given to farmers to plant
and end hunger in Uganda, those against the bill have severally
complained that introduction of GMOs will wipe out Uganda's largely
organic farming industry.
On Wednesday, the
committee on Science and Technology presented two reports of their
findings on the bill, pitting the pro and anti-GMO legislators against
each other.
In the main report,
committee chairman, Robert Kafeero Ssekitoleko (Nakifuma), said the
committee had endorsed the bill because several GMO crops are already
being researched on in Uganda and are in advanced stages. Kafeero said
the enactment of an enabling law will enhance the safe development of
modern biotechnology.
"The biggest
challenges are how to adapt the production of food in view of the
climate changes, and how to develop further the role of agricultural
biotechnology in combating the global challenge. Crop varieties that are
more resilient to drought, flooding, saline or acid soils and
temperature extremes resulting from climate change may be needed, and
adaptation-related technologies, including biotechnology, may play their
part," the main report reads in part.
The report states
that the intention of the proposed law is to provide for a regulatory
framework that facilitates the safe development and application of
modern biotechnology in Uganda.
However, two MPs on
the committee, Atkins Katusabe (Bukonzo West) and Lee Denis Oguzu
(Maracha), authored a minority report, raising concerns about genetic
pollution, which may arise due to cross pollination, hence wiping out
the traditional breeds and development of crop varieties that risk
affecting soil fertility.
The two MPs also
outlined the risk of external influence, brought on by the varied
interest in the introduction of GMOs in the country through foreign
companies.
Katusabe said that
between 2010 and 2011, financial resources for agricultural
biotechnological research were largely received from philanthropic
organizations and intergovernmental organizations, while government only
contributed three per cent
EXTERNAL INFLUENCE
He said amendments
by the committee did not address the risk of external influence, which
necessitates a comprehensive regulatory impact assessment to critically
assess the adverse risks of external influence and financial
sustainability of advancing biotechnology systems.
"The country's
progress in biotechnology relies on donors who advance their own agenda
or interests, which may include extending risk of GMO development away
from their home countries. The bill should be referred back to the
sponsor," the minority report states.
However, Kafeero
said once the law is enacted, a national focal point and authority, as
well as a national biosafety committee will be created to regulate the
use of GMOs in the country.
President Yoweri
Museveni, while touring a demonstration farm at Kawumu State Lodge in
Luweero district on March 20, said the bill will help the country
resolve some of the problems the agriculture sector faces, including
drought.
Museveni said the bill should be passed to help improve farming practices, backed by modern research and technology.
Peter
Wamboga-Mugirya, a pro-GMO activist, told The Observer that the
legislation should have been introduced years ago, to help combat the
growing challenges in the agricultural sector.
Citing the long
spells of drought, coupled with the recent attack on crops by the fall
armyworms, Mugirya said Ugandans are cold towards biotechnology because
they have not been well informed about its benefits.
"When virulent
viruses attack crops, what can scientists do after they have applied all
conventional methods to fight these diseases? Their best shot is at
genetic engineering to counter these problems. Biotechnology gives
advanced solutions; so, let us help our farmers," Mugirya said in a
phone interview.
No comments:
Post a Comment