Foodfarmnewstv

FADAMA 111 PROJECT ADDITIONAL FINANCING

FADAMA 111 PROJECT ADDITIONAL FINANCING
supporting farming as a business with focus on Rice, Cassava, Sorghum and Tomato value chains.

Search This Blog

Total Pageviews

SPONSORED

SPONSORED
Nigerian Institute of Soil Science- NISS

Translate to Other Languages

Latest News




The Nigerian Agricultural Quarantine Service (NAQS)

Friday 11 May 2018

Public hearing: NASS set to pass six agricultural bills


Standing for National Anthem in redcap and white, Chairman Committee on Agric, Colleges and Institutions Hon. Linus Okorie


·       *Shea butter Research Institute faces no objection.

The recently held public hearing at the National Assembly, House of Representative Committee on Agriculture, Colleges and Institutions led by Hon. Linus Okorie was very receptive to inputs and objective criticisms to six agricultural bills that may soon be passed into law for efficient global practice towards meeting global market.

Hon. Okorie in his remark implored the professional stakeholders at the room 028, venue of the public hearing to ensure objective inputs and criticisms that would give all the bills a robust power to attain the best agricultural practice in Nigeria, pointed that the economic diversification of our economy would not be competitive if measures to ensure standard practices are not put in place to drive the sector in a holistic manner of speaking with one voice.
Association of Vet Medical Student, University of Abuja, holding foodfarmnews National President Okwuada Steven

Among the bills are “ (1) a bill for an Act to regulate the Profession of Agriculture and to make provision for the establishment, functions and administration of Nigeria Institute for Agriculturists and for other related matters (HB.836). (2) A bill for an Act to repeal the Veterinary surgeons Act. Cap. V3, laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 and for other related matters (HB.836). (3) A bill for Act to Amend the Nigerian Research Institutes Act Cap. N132, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 to include the Establishment of the Shea Butter Research Institute: and for other related Matters (HB.127). (4) A bill for an Act to amend the Nigeria Cooperative Societies Act (Registration and Operation of Cooperative Societies through the federation), cap. N98, law of the federation of Nigeria, 2004 to provide for stiffer penalties to meet Contemporary realities and for other related matters (HB.887). (5) A bill for an Act to amend the Federal Universities of Agriculture Act, Cap. F22, laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 to specify the Minimum qualification of the chairman of the Governing council, Ownership of the intellectual property and provide the pre action Notice to the university authority; and for Other Related Matters (HB.1116). (6) A bill for an Act to establish the Fisheries Research Institute of Nigeria, NGO, for Fisheries Research, Education and cooperative Training in Nigeria and for other related Matters (HB 1310)”.

The first bill asking for the establishment of Nigerian Institute of Professional Agriculturalists presented by the Hon. Okorie received several supports, and criticisms premised on the need to critically look into grey and conflicting areas within the already established Acts for each existing profession in the federation unit of the sector so as to avoid constitutional breach of the law.
Both Honorable Mohammed  Mongunu and Munir Babba Danagundi supported the bill being co-sponsors alongside with many other speakers and the Agricultural Society of Nigeria (ASN). 

Speaking on the need for one voice for agricultural development in terms of policy presentation to Government, Hon. Mongunu said the establishment of the Institute would be handy to checkmate rejection of our agricultural produce in the global market, added that its timing cannot be better than now when the Administration of President Mohammadu Buhari is clamoring for economic diversification using agriculture with best agronomic practices to ensure standard produce at the food value chains for healthy nutrition. 

This position was reinforced by Hon. Danagundi who pointed that the Committee on Agriculture and other members of the Institute for Agriculture Research (IAR) had gone to Sudan to under-study how same Institution has been speaking with one voice without conflict among the different professions in the sector, pointed that the passage of the bill for the establishment of the Institute in Nigeria would not tampered with other different professional functions in the agricultural federation unit of the country, but rather would add value to it. 
Cross Section of Stakeholders

The memorandum submitted by Agricultural Society of Nigeria (ASN) National President, Dr. Adeyemi Olojede totally supported the bill using thirteen (13) points to buttress its support with Nos 5 saying that “like in Medicine, Engineering and Law, there is no way you can practice animal science without soil, or agricultural economics or agricbusiness without touching agronomy or crop protection or extension. This apex body (NIAg) has taken care of all the disciplines as they are well represented in the board of the Institute”.

 “The proposed bill is highly encompassing, coherent, scoped and focused considering the membership composition, the discipline and objective as contained in the bill” Based on all the above “it is the prayer of the agricultural Society of Nigeria that the proposed bill should be allowed to sail through as the provisions contained therein are in the best interest of agricultural profession, stakeholders and the nation”.

However this position was met with three objections with strong advocacy for amendment and adjustment of the grey areas for the bill to sail through for passage into law. Other supporters of the bill are the Agricultural Research Council of Nigeria (ARCN), Faculty of Agriculture, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria and Agricultural Science society of Nigeria and Animal Production Institute.

First to make a case against the bill was the Nigeria Institute for Animal Science (NIAS) led by Dr. I. A Adu who spoke on the need to allow different professions in the sector to operate the act that had established them saying “specialization is what the world is talking about like is found in the medicine. It is wrong to say one Institute will regulate all the aspects of Agriculture. The proposed law is becoming too late and it is going to cause confusion in the sector. It is against NIAS mandate in the livestock industry; and it will stop advancement in agricultural sector”.
Cross Section of Stakeholders

Flowing in the same direction with NIAS, Dr. Dele Oyediji representing the National President, Animal Science Association of Nigeria (ASSN) said that the Institute should be given an encompassing name adding the oath his members as animal scientists have sworn to did not permit joining another association.

Both Professors Garba Sharubutu, President Veterinary Council of Nigeria and Ikoku were of the view that many clauses in the bill have to be well defined for clarity of professional conflict. Prof. Sharubutu pointed out that despite his support for the bill, there were areas that needed to be clarified saying “the colleges of agriculture students who are not degree holders have been sidelined and there is no clear definition of some terminology in the bill.

Prof Ikoku said he would have supported the bill if it were to be in year 1978, but with present dispensation “there are several sharp things in the bill that need to be well defined as regards specializations. This generalization cannot subsist in agriculture because of many specializations that are involved. 

At the end of deliberation on the first bill, Hon. Linus observed that no memorandum was presented by any civil society saying this was important to note against any objection after the passage. He however asked whether there is any established law that the passage of the bill into an Act would be contradicting.
Cross Section of Stakeholders

Responding Hon. Mongunu speaking as lawyer said the passage of the bill would not contradict any constitutional act, a position that was supported by both Dr. Olojede and Hon. Danagundi.

The “bill for an Act to repeal the Veterinary Surgeons Act. Cap. V3, law of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 and other related Matters” had countered opposing views along professional lines of veterinarians, pharmacists, animal technologists and scientists who all argued that a single body cannot effectively control, regulate and administer animals’ health and disease control cum drug administration. This attracted longer argument based on Act establishing the Pharmaceutical Council of Nigeria (PCN) that gave power to them over any drug administration and the rest.

Both ARCN and many other stakeholders agreed that the bill to re-enact the veterinary surgeon act 2016 be passed as a single body saying the passage would enhance best practices in the administration of the practitioners and animal productivity and health management in the country. While some other professional bodies held a strong view against the bill for being passed.

The committee of Deans of Veterinary, University of Abuja supported the passage of the bill 100% saying it would enhance the quality of animals being consumed by human-beings thereby effectively controlling zoonic diseases in Nigeria through proper regulation and control. It will also regulate veterinary pathologists and those that would be registered as surgeons in Nigeria. 

But Dr. Oyediji on behalf of NIAS disagreed with this position, stated that it was a calculated ploy to stiff out its members, thereby asking that clauses in section 16 (1) and 16 (3) be expunged as they have taken away their mandate power, adding that the bill is intended to inherit the power of the Animal/Husbandry in the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.
Rt-Lt..Prof. Garba Sharubutu, Prof. B.M Agaue Fodio university, Mr. Dehinde Ayeni, Food Farm News & Prof. J.B Adeyanju.

In his paraphrase of the memorandum submitted by the Nigerian Association of Animal Health and Husbandry Technologists, Dr. Oluwadare O. Paul, Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Moorplantion, Ibadan said that his members did not support the bill because their roles were not well spelt out saying there was a fraudulent use of the word Veterinary Para-Professional in the bill. For instance there is no way that groups of persons categorized as Veterinary Para Professional can perform as professionals. There is no due qualification (s) specified for this group of persons called veterinary Para-professionals. He demanded clarity on their role. See the full text below. 

Also the clause on administration of animal drugs dragged as the Pharmaceutical Council of Nigeria ( PCN) claimed mandate ownership by the Act that had created it on anything drug administration and productivity. But many argued that the pharmaceutical training did not include animal pathological surgery that would give them sound anatomy of animals towards adequate drug administration and application.

One critical question asked the PCN by Hon. Okorie was to know whether there is a particular store of where both animals and human drugs are being sold in the country, but there was not proper response than a place in Ibadan and one other which general opinions believed is too decimal to the issue on ground.

The last bill attended to on the first day of public hearing was the bill sponsored by Hon. (Dr.) Abubakar Amuda Kannike seeking passage for the establishment of the shea butter Research Institute based on its economic potential as a wild fruit trees that can be properly harnessed for more economic value for the entire nation and job creation for both women and the youths as both the ARCN and NIFOR supported the bill to be passed without any opposition.    

AN ADDENDUM OF ARGUMENT PRESENTED BY NIGERIAN ANIMAL HEALTH PRACTITIONERS ON THE BILL FOR ACT TO REPEAL THE VETERINARY SURGEONS Act. Cap. V3, LAWS OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA, 2004 AND FOR OTHER RELATED MATTERS (HB 836) AND RE-ENACT THE VETERINARY SURGEONS ACT 2016 (HB. 1611836).

Sponsored by The Chairman, House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture, Colleges and Institutions, Hon. Linus Okorie, FCA.
-
By introduction, an Animal Health and Husbandry/ Production Technologist is a person trained in the specialized field of Animal Health and Husbandry/ Production and dully equipped with both knowledge and skill as his basic working tools. He is the local facilitator of technological advancements and the domestic implementer of the modern innovations in the discovery team at all stages of Animal Welfare Delivery System (AWDS). 

The roles and duties of Animal Health Technologists are complementary to many others in the areas of animal health, consumer safety and environmental protection as cardinal players in animal welfare delivery team – while the Veterinary surgeons are specially trained as consultants to perform surgery and prescribe treatment to animals diagnosed with ailments, it is the Animal Health Technologists who administer the drugs and effect the clinical management; take the feedbacks and laboratory samples or other data related surveillance circumstances for the scientists/ developers to examine and analyze towards the provision of quality and dependable results, diagnosis, economic/ performance improvement and other innovational development. The Technologists also make the necessary follow-up to the client, treatment, consumer and society at large; compile report of any new outbreaks, inspection of slaughtered animals, and ensure provision of safe and animals for human consumption. The Technologists also regulate movement of animals across the nation – especially in the spread and control of outbreaks and epidemics. He coordinates vaccination programs and campaigns for animals and offer general extension services in towns and villages amongst other regulated duties and services.

The Nigerian Association of Animal Health Practitioners wishes to humbly forward the following arguments to further call for the attention of other stakeholders to the following observations as Nigerian experience of Veterinary Legislation and Veterinary Practice, which concerns the Animal Health profession, Practice and Professionalism:

1.       The fact that when announcement for this Open Hearing was published, it probably or carefully out left the issue of “and Re-Enactment of the Veterinary Surgeons Act 2016 (HB 836)”. The probability here might means in the sincerity of integrity and honesty of omission; or consciously done with due care, which might amount to obnoxious consent as further expression of biased aptitudes. However, this actually denied us of full information hindered us of sacrosanct preparation in the development and submission of our position papers as stakeholders. 

2.       That Nigerian Veterinary Practitioners have always been parading around the Hallowed Chambers of the National Legislature or other Legal Centers for various encumbering issues of their practice, profession or professionalism than most other sectors of the national economy, especially on the issues around Bills or other related matters – to Repeal or Re-Enact, to Edit or Amend or call for Amendment etc. This should be the time to call for decent approach that can move us forward as a nation through reasonable consideration of this particular subject matter. Since Healthcare Delivery is a composite professional jurisprudence – it therefore place holistic legislative demands and ethical responsibilities for due consideration, perusal and technical competence on the Nigerian veterinary practice to recognize or acknowledge, engage, adopt and involve every other players, members and components in Animal Welfare Delivery Team for our national healthcare interests, domestic development, local survival and global relevance indicia.

3.       Arbitration to International Legal Framework for Fair and Stable Globalization – achieving the goal of decent work in the globalized economy requires action at the international level. The world community is responding to this challenge in part by developing international legal instruments on trade, finance, environment, human rights and labour. The ILO contributes to this legal framework by elaborating and promoting international labour standards aimed at making sure that economic growth and development go along with the creation of decent work. The long overdue approach of repealing of the Nigerian Veterinary Surgeons’ Bill is sacrosanct to the emergence of other contemporary players of global animal welfare delivery team in Nigeria – in both the existing Veterinary Surgeons’ Act Cap. 464 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004, and the Veterinary Surgeons Act 2016 (HB. 1611836) to be re-enacted, there are inundated conflictions, confusions, crises and challenges enlisted due to wrong or falsified interpretation, biased adoption, erroneous application and disenfranchised others in the domestication of local veterinary profession, practice and professionalism as stipulated by conglomerates of multinational membership countries and other principal multi-governmental organizations of reference:

a.       Office International de Epizooties (OIE) was created in January 25th 1924 to fight animal diseases at global level through the office of World Organization for Animal Health (WOHA) to promote animal health, animal welfare; the consumer safety and public health as well as protection of environmental safety. The Nigerian experience as Veterinary Authority – which the Veterinary Council of Nigeria is a local reflection of its global face. Therefore, Bamako (OIE) 2011 Declaration strongly advocates for the emergence of Animal Health Practitioners Regulatory Authority in every member countries in this multi-governmental organization, which Nigeria is not only a principal player but also a signatory.

b.      World Health Organization (WHO) – Geneva 2001 Global One Health-One Medicine Initiatives for Tropical Health adopted the African Medical and Public Health Agreement for tropical membership countries to attract, harmonize and encourage competence, complementary and decent professionalism among health professionals and technical workers to drive quality indigenous resources and objective healthcare delivery. 

c.       International Labor Organization (ILO) – The ILO report also shows that legislation alone is not sufficient to fight discrimination effectively. Ninety per cent of member states have ratified the ILO core labour standards seeking to fight discrimination and have thereby committed themselves to enacting laws to this effect. But discrimination is still part of everyday life. The need to protect people from being discriminated against on the grounds of age, disability, sex, sexual identity, orientation and service, racial or ethnic origin and religion and belief. Therefore, protection against discrimination is enshrined in the member countries’ constitution and an Equal Treatment Act (Allgemeines Gleichbehandlungsgesetz, abbreviated to AGG) was enacted in 2006 in Germany.

d.      International Trade Organization (ITO) – Occupational safety and health: When trade unions demand decent working conditions, they mean more than a decent wage. The argument for the agreement ass that “Work-life balance is the balance a worker can achieve between family life, private life and profession. Adjusting this balance is also a factor in decent work. The expansion of decent work with fair pay throughout many developing and emerging countries has a direct impact on environmental protection. If people cannot care for themselves, they will not be able to protect the environment either”. Therefore, professional intimidation, molestation and orchestrated cohesion or corrosive inclusion of Animal health Practitioners by the Nigerian Veterinary practitioners through the Veterinary Council of Nigeria is ethically porous, biased and a demonstration of misplacement of priority.

e.      Food and Agriculture Organization – Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations, International Labor Conference, 102nd Session, 2013 – food, agriculture, health and productive society is a composite dividend that entails:
                     i.            Freedom of associations, collective bargaining and industrial relations
                   ii.            Abolition of Forced Labor
                  iii.            Equity of opportunity and treatment under tripartite consultation
                 iv.            Employment policy and promotion
                   v.            Vocational guidance and training
                 vi.            Employment security and wages
4.       In addition, this domesticated unethical Nigerian Veterinary Legislation gesture and attitude is in total aberration to various local concepts and contents – 

a.       Annexure II, Stakeholders’ Consultative Forum on Veterinary Legislation and Veterinary Practice in Nigeria – Wednesday 29th to Thursday 30th August 2005, Confluence Beech Hotel, Lokoja Kogi State: The Roles of Animal Health and Husbandry Technologists in Nigerian Economic Livestock Production and Development: adoption of Collaborative Working Environment – a collaborative working environment (CWE) supports people (e.g. e-professionals) in their local professionalism, individual professionals and cooperative professional work for objective research in CWE, which involves organizational, technical and social issues. Even if anything worthwhile will be for Nigerian Interface of Global Animal Health Practice, Veterinary Legislation must ensure the agreed the emergence, emancipation and integration of the main stakeholders and players, especially the organizational harmonization of Veterinary Surgeons, Animal Health Practitioners.

Thereafter, there was a Joint-Committee of Nigerian veterinary Surgeons and Nigerian Animal Health and Husbandry technologists set up by the extant of this Agreement to draft and develop a copy of the Harmonized Comparative Provisions for the Nigerian Veterinary Surgeons and Nigerian Animal Health Technologists as a single Harmonized Comparative Provisions for the Nigerian Veterinary and Animal Health Practitioners Board be presented to the Nigerian Hallowed Legislative Chambers for the perusal and necessary legislative actions and enactment, which the subsequent leadership of Nigerian Veterinary Council declined to administer for reasons which are yet to be disclosed up to this present moment.

b.      It stands as a breach of interest and practice to the ethical agreement to form Nigerian Veterinary Regulatory Body by the Veterinary Council of Nigeria and Nigerian Animal Health Practitioners Council (NAHPC) when fully constituted, which was another agreement during Dr. G. A. P. Ogundipe-led Veterinary Council of Nigeria administration through the Nigerian Veterinary Statutory Body as stipulated by the multinational players agreement of the  animal welfare (Terrestrial or Aquatic Codes) delivery for the animal, environment, consumers and the global society of OIE, WHO, FAO, ITO, ILO, amongst others.
c.       In addition, this gesture and attitude is also against the judgment delivered by the Hon. Justice (Dr.) Dingba on 24th March 2017 with Suit No: FHC/ Abj/CS/66/2008 NVMA Vs. PCN. This should be deleted from this Bill.

5.       The approved training and qualification of the Veterinary Profession lacks due interpretation, welfare consideration, terms of reference for registration and regulation of any Para-Professional concepts, contents or competence, therefore, the welfare, operational jurisprudence and occupational interests of these “Veterinary Para-Professionals” will NEVER be protected as they are not represented in the Council membership as enlisted in the Bill. Therefore, since the Veterinary Council of Nigeria is just a single spine regulatory body of the veterinarians thereby referred to as “Veterinary Authority”, it is totally unacceptable for the Veterinary Council of Nigeria to translate, translocate or mutate its functions to regulate other Professionals in Animal Welfare Delivery Team or Global Animal Health Practice as regulatory and statutory body for registration and oversight functions. In addition, This Bill that established the Nigerian Veterinary Council has no provisional interpretation and operational terms to admit, train, graduate, register or regulate other Para-professionals captioned in its functions, it is therefore an obnoxious oversight to supervise, regulate and manage what the veterinary profession was never part of in the definition, making and administration of its constituents and components.

Our Prayers
We, therefore, strongly reject any subtle subjugation through injurious inclusion of the name, title, practice, profession or professionalism of “Animal Health” in any Part, Section, Sub-Section or Subject, for instance as contained in Part 1, Section 2 (g), which stated that “The Director of Veterinary Services of each State and the Head of the Animal Health Section of the Federal Capital”, because it was Boldly captioned “who shall be a Registered veterinary Surgeon” in the proposed Re-Enactment of 2016 Bill 2016 proposed.
In addition, the word “Para” in the context of this quest for professional jurisprudence should be rather applied as Allied” as applicable in other global relevant animal health references for domestic (national) professionalism, functions and operations.



SIGNED this 10th May, 2018 for NAAHHT Rapid Response Technical Team (RRTT) by:
OLUWADARE O. Paul, AFIOR, CAHT, FHRD.
Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology,
Ibadan. 08055622906, olatundunhm@gmail.com
REFERENCES
Collins Webster Dictionary (2012)
Decent work and poverty eradication: Literature Review and Two-Country Study – A Study for the Decent Work and Labour Standards Forum, January 2010
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_working_environment
http://www.decent-work-worldwide.org/index.php?option=com_content&...
http://www.ilo.org/global/standards/introduction-to-international-labour-s...
http://www.ilo.org/ilc/ILCSessions/102/media-centre/news/WCMS_216400/lang, 102nd International Labour Conference – No Sustainable Development Without Environmental Sustainability and Decent Work
International Journal of Institute for Operations research (Vol. 12, 2006): Technologists in The Nations’ Building
International Labor Office, Geneva
Oxford Learners Dictionary (2008)

No comments:

Post a Comment