The agricultural challenges are enormous and proactive steps
have to be taken for radical challenge according to the President, All Farmers’
Association of Nigeria, Architect Kabiru Ibrahim who is asking the Federal
Government to allocate 20% of the 2015 total budget of Four trillion naira to
agricultural development that will give research, power and processing zone a
right of place to economic development. Read his Excerpts below.
Let us meet you sir.
My name is Architect Kabiru Ibrahim, the President, All
Farmers Association of Nigeria (AFAN)
How is AfAN under your
leadership?
AFAN is strategizing to get government recognition. We think
this new government can do much more things to Nigerians by paying serious
attention to agriculture as it is very clear that oil is almost a curse to us
as Nigeria. Of course we have abandoned everything else and concentrate of oil.
As you can see in the recent past we have had a problem of oil falling and
becoming very uncertain as we had never had in the past. This has got negative
effect on the current budget meaning our much reliance on oil has impacted
negatively on all other sectors including agriculture.
The only thing that we
have that has kept us going even before oil was discovered is agriculture. So
is just a question of restoring the dignity in the sector by investing more, create a reliable
environment for farmers to be able to improve their yield and be able to
process their produce for market in a well packaged way rather than selling
only at a primary form. We can only do this if there are accesses to finance
with adequate funding of research so that farmers will be able to get improved
inputs and access to land. You know there are a lot of innovations now in
agriculture as you know what to plant and where a particular crop can have
comparative advantages ecologically.
You need to know the deficiency in a
particular soil by introducing the nutrients that can complement the soil
deficiency. You need to plant crops with high resistance to a particular
climate change with a prolific seed that can make a farmer quickly get out from
subsistence farming to commercial. With this, the country can become food
secured and exporter of her produce. All these can be possible if we allowed
Maputo declaration that says every signatory in African continent must devote
10% his annual budget to agriculture. We are even asking this government to
dedicate 20% of its budget for two years to agriculture as it will tremendously
help the sector as our budget stands at four trillion. 20% of 4 trillion
multiply by 2 will give you 1.6 trillion which when properly deployed to
developing agriculture will go a long way in creating processing zones that
will be well powered by effective energy for processing and preservative of
perishable produce for better market. Also there should be creation of parks
where heavy duty tractors and combined harvesters are displayed for hiring to
farmers.
The idea of giving 2 -3 power horse tractors that the states are
buying for farmers have shown that majority of these are sold out to the neighboring
countries like Niger and Ghana just as some of the money injected into
fertilizers are sham and fraud. For example if government put 3 billion naira
in fertilizer procurement whereby about ten farmers will be asked to share a
bag does not make any sense. It is a process that allows corrupt practices
through connivers that always leads to inaccurate supply.
I want you to dwell
more on these tractors that are being sold when given out to farmers, are we
sure the farmers are real?
You see, our take in AFAN is that agriculture has crossed
borders where your political inclination does not matter as long as you are a
farmer. But when government in her wisdom decides to give out things based on
political affiliation will also lead to sham as many of them sold out the
tractors since they are not farmers.
How structured is AFAN
to close up this gap to ensuring effectiveness of whatever support government
is giving as regards seeds, fertilizer, tractors etc?
We have always had the appropriate structures; AFAN is in
every ward of the federation. We have chairmen in each local government, states
and wards of the federation and all the government needs to do when she wants
to distribute whatever inputs is to involve our members on the committee for
effective monitoring of identifying real farmers so as to avoid the cases of
meddle men. So we are well structured to do this. As I sit with you, I can call
all my chairmen in all the states, and they will in turn call other chairmen at
the local government and it can continue in this order down to the wards
levels.
If you look at Federal Government’s claim of 14 million farmers being
reached to our compilation, you will agree with me that the number is too small
compared to the population of farmers in Nigerial. Since I became the President
of AFAN, I have asked all our states’ chairmen to bring all their registered
farmers and what we are getting is quite impressive as an average of
600,000-700,000 from each state.
Some people are in the
school of thought that government’s role should be limited to policy making
while the aspect of buying and selling should be left with the private sectors,
what is your take on that?
This should be the natural trend. The farmers choose to be a
farmer by choice. So the government is just to give an enabling environment for
farming to strive. As you put it yourself, good policy will help the system by
making farmers to farm appropriately by
being about to choose comparative crops for farming with the necessary improved
inputs that they can easy buy in the markets.
The government tends to say that
are subsidizing, but is there any such subsidy? It is the office people that
are being subsidized not the farmers. In France for instance the farmers also
play a part in the policy making as farmers’ population is about 3% of the
total population, and there are lot of agricultural activities going on there
with high level of food exports bringing money into the covers of the
individual and governments. But here with population of farmers in the country,
we can hardly feed ourselves talk less of exporting. But if government plays
its part the way it should by providing appropriate level of power energy that
will assist in processing of crops for better market, and also providing
quality research that will give prolific seeds through thorough regulation with
efficient soil information before planting. If you remember in the 60-70s,
before the arrival of oil, the economy of Nigeria is driven by agriculture, and
the arrival of crude oil has brought us to this mess.
Talking about finance,
we have Bank of Agriculture (BOA) who is to deploy finance to farmers, how
would you rate their performance?
You see the BOA concept is very good but the application is
where I have reservation, while our farmers also are not helping matters by
taking agriculture as business. Majority of them tend to think the borrowed
money is free as they never bother to pay back this loan thereby denying many
other farmers the opportunity of getting the money. This always brings back the
issue of re financing of the bank because the money lends out is not paid back.
Also you will recall the commercial agricultural loan which came up around 2009
that involved many commercial banks where many farmers benefitted but because
of the low purchasing power of people, mindset of farmers, inefficient power
energy and high cost of transportation, paying back become difficult. People
who tampered with any government money should be made to pay penalty for doing
so. But if they go scot free, then you cannot see any development in any
sector. Also the BOA official must ensure qualification of farmers though due
process before he or she can be given loan without needing to collect any note
from the Minister or any other personality, and that is how a bank should work.
The ATA of this
outgoing administration has claimed to be doing very well especially in area of
inputs to farmers with food increase to 21 million metric tons in two years, what
is your take on that?
It is very easy to make this claim that you have increased
food production, but this should be associated with prosperity. If a farmer
reduces twelfth of his production last year as result of not being able to sell
what he has produced as a result of no market, can that be called an increase in food
production? Have you looked at the pocket of the farmers relatively to the
purchasing power of the people? The fact is that the purchasing powers of
Nigerians have reduced. Well I believe the fact are clearer now as the whole
system has failed and this why many people are looking for this change.
So if
there was increase in food production as farmers are the largest population, so
how come the change that swept this government aside? The increase is just
rhetoric and it not real. If anybody is telling you farmers are making pumper
harvest, I think they are making mistake as pumper harvest to farmers is being
able to produce and sell, not production where buck of it are rotten away.
If you are being
present before the senate as minister of agriculture, what are the defence you
are going to make to promote agriculture as policy that will given a paradigm
shift?
First we focus our investment in agriculture through our
mind set. We do not necessary need to give direct money to farmers but through
a well funding research that will assist farmers in terms of improved technologies
and embracement of bio technology products to enhance crops and animal challenges
as regards pest, diseases and drought.
Take Burkina Faso for instance all the
economy over there is completely funded by agriculture and this has happened
because she has been able to adopt bio technology into agricultural system of
the economy. I will advocate for a strategy where by comparative advantage
crops on regional basis will be promoted with improved technology of research
so that every region of our society will have what is best situated for it.
Then you put in your energy to developing those crops in line with value chain
production. In France I saw personally three segregated crops being planted in
the three regions. While the corn is grown in the southern region, the North
West plant soya beans and the other part grapes and all are doing well for the
entire nation.
Let me have your word
on mechanization tractorization of the federal government?
The concept as it is today is not worth it.
You know if you
are bringing these small tractors of two horse power and giving them to
selected people, look they will not use them on their land as many of them sell
it because they do not need it. Why should government be buying tractors every
year? Because a tractor can be used for five years if well managed. What I am
trying to say is that we should create parks for tractors where farmers can
easily access varieties of tractors for clearing, ploughing and harvesters. For
example if a group of farmers want to clear 1000 hectares, they can approach
the park centres at an affordable price.
This will be better than giving three
or four horse power to a farmer who has no farm of his own. If you go to Ghana
you will see some of these tractors that are sold there. A state in the North
sometimes bought many of these small tractors, and many people given have sold
them out to the neighbouring countries around. The Federal government
tractorization of the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development
cannot work because of these smaller tractors.
Anybody that want to do
agriculture as business will have his own tractor, but what at AFAN level is
doing is to ensure small scale farmers have access to these tractors through
our groups. For agricultural commercialization to succeed, we need to emphasis
on getting groups of farmers into groups to do mechanized farming. This is what happens anywhere in the world.
About fifty years ago in America, a large chunk of the population about 70%
were farmers, but today you have a limited population, in France only 3%
population are farmers who export sweet corn to other countries. All these
sweet corn you see are from France.
No comments:
Post a Comment