Add Organic Farmers |
Washington —
Conventional farming and food production practices in this country are
creating serious environmental and public health problems. Every day, an
industrial farming system spinning out of control confronts all
Americans with serious challenges.
Among these are the explosion in
toxic algae blooms in sensitive waterways, cancer-causing pesticides on
foods we feed our children, the rapid spread of antibiotic-resistant
superbugs, and, of course, contaminated drinking water, all courtesy of
corporate agribusiness.
Thankfully, we have an alternative: organic.
Study after study shows organic food is better for our health, and organic farming is better for our environment.
Organic milk has
higher concentrations of beneficial nutrients than its conventional
counterpart, and organic foods can have higher levels of antioxidants
and far fewer, if any, pesticide residues than conventionally grown
crops. In addition to the notable consumer benefits, organic farming
consumes far less energy and can reduce water pollution, increase
biodiversity, promote healthy soils and sequester significantly more
carbon than conventional farming.
The Environmental
Working Group (EWG) has been advocating for organic food and farming for
more than two decades, with much of our research documenting how the
practices and finished products of both conventional and organic
agriculture influence our health and the environment.
Despite years of
double-digit growth, far outstripping that seen in the conventional food
sector, the number of certified organic farms in the U.S. is struggling
to keep pace with soaring consumer demand
In that time, I
have worked alongside many pioneers and have seen organic farming grow
from a fledgling movement available to few, into a nearly $40 billion a
year industry. Organic is now the fastest growing segment of the U.S.
food industry with some of the country's largest retailers struggling to
keep up with customer demand and keep their store shelves stocked.
Despite years of
double-digit growth, far outstripping that seen in the conventional food
sector, the number of certified organic farms in the U.S. is struggling
to keep pace with soaring consumer demand. According to the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, in 2012, fewer than 1 percent of American
farms were classified as organic. This has forced many organic food
companies in the U.S. to turn to foreign suppliers to meet customer
demand.
There is no reason
why we cannot be meeting the surging demand for organic foods here at
home, growing and producing it ourselves. However, if we are going to
grow more organic food in this country we will need more organic
farmers. That means recruiting new farmers, and helping existing farmers
transition to organic.
Easier said than done.
We will need to
provide farmers with technical assistance to help them transition to
organic. We will also need to invest in more science and research to
ensure that organic and transitioning farmers are armed with high
yielding, regionally adapted seeds, designed with organic systems in
mind.
Now, you don't have
to be a D.C. lobbyist or congressional staffer to know that the purse
strings on Capitol Hill have been pulled tight in recent years, and
funds supporting agriculture are tethered closely to the interests of
Big Ag, not organic. While EWG will continue to call on Congress to make
serious investments in organic in the next farm bill, there is a lot
that can be accomplished in the interim if the organic community pools
its resources, and approves an organic research and promotions program. That is why EWG supports the organic check-off program.
The principle of a
check-off program is simple: Producers of a particular commodity pool
their resources, and collectively invest in research and promotion of
that commodity. These programs are authorized by Congress and directed
by industry-driven boards overseen by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture. While this sounds simple, it hasn't always worked out in
the best interest of producers.
EWG is fully aware
that farmers have been burned by past check-off programs, and we are
glad that so many in the organic community have been part of productive
discussions about the organic check-off currently under consideration.
After all of those discussions one thing is clear: The organic check-off
is not your father's check-off.
It is the first
such program that is not based on a specific commodity, but rather on
the notion that if everyone pitches in a little, the organic community
can address its shared research, education and promotion needs together.
With the funds
raised every year from the check-off, the organic community would be
able to provide transitioning farmers with greater technical assistance
and training to bring more acres into organic production.
It would also be
able to fill in the research gaps left every year by limited federal
research dollars that all too often skew toward outdated and damaging
industrial farming practices. And, the check-off will ensure that the
organic sector has an opportunity to educate consumers about organic and
promote its benefits in the same way that major commodities like milk
and pork were able to do with the "Got Milk?" and "Pork. The Other White
Meat" campaigns, respectively.
To be clear, both
Congress and organic food companies will also have to do their parts to
increase funding for research and promotion of organic in the years to
come. But that shouldn't stop the organic community from supporting the
organic check-off program and taking organic to the next level.
After all, EWG not
only believes that organic farming can help feed the world, we believe
that organic systems and practices may be the only way to do so
sustainably. However, the footprint of organic on the agricultural
landscape and in Americans' shopping carts must grow significantly if we
are to realize organic's full potential to feed the planet in ways that
enhance the environment and public health. I hope you will join me in supporting the GRO Organic campaign to make this a reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment