From RT-LT –
Nat. President RIFAN Mallam Aminu Goronyo, Nat. Organizing Secr. Alh. Wodi Muhamadu,
MD New Nigeria Comm. Marketing Company, Abubakar Musa, Chief Livinus Ngawangwa
(JP) and others.
The National President, Rice Farmers Association of Nigeria (RIFAN) Mallam Aminu Goronyo has promised that his members would not hesitate to vote out President Buhari if he decided not to effect the decision on banning imported rice through the land borders saying Nigeria has got no gain expending five million dollar on rice import daily.
In his office
at the top hill of Maitama, Abuja, RIFAN President, Goronyo with some of his
members commended the Government of President Muhammadu Buhari for the spirited
effort he has exhibited in repositioning the agricultural sector especially in
the backward integration of rice productivity which he said has positively
impacted in reducing import deficit being incurred daily, and thereby promised
a protest against any opposition to the decision.
Mallam Goronyo
said that the association would support the Nigeria Custom and any other in the
fight against any smuggler that insisted on violating the closure decision of
the Federal Government by the time it is finally effected to curb smuggling and
importation through illegal routes.
The RIFAN
President while responding to the question whether his association has got the
capacity to produce enough paddy for millers to feed the nation said that this
present administration has experienced high foreign exchange that had made rice
importers to be running at a high loss, and this thereby pointed to the fact
that the local rice farmers have been the ones feeding the nation. He stressing
that the farmers’ present production level was a good evidence of farmers’
capacity to feed the nation.
His response
with Food Farm News read thus “No
Nigerian rice importer has the capacity to import rice into Nigeria with the
view of make profit going by the rate of a dollar to Naira in the country. You
know if you buy the foreign rice, you will sell at a loss. No one will want to
engage in such business venture, so If
this has been the case it means that the rice we have been eating are being
grown locally by our farmers. Therefore we have more than enough capacity to
produce more than enough rice for Nigerians to eat. So the plan to close the
land borders by the government is a welcome idea. The RIFAN welcomes the idea,
it is a good development and we are going to defend the move. Sincerely
speaking anybody that attempts to say no to this will be protested against.
Seriously, even if President Buhari today says he has revised his decision to
let rice come into the country through the land border, then we will protest
against it. We will protest against him, and he will loss his votes, no more
vote for him, and we will vote him out.
So we support the border closure and we are ready to defend it”
It means the rice association will
join the custom in the struggle with smugglers?
Of course,
not only the Nigeria Custom Service, we will join anybody who is ready to
defend the borders’ closure, and it is only the enemies of this country that
will say they do not welcome the idea “
Meanwhile some
Nigerians have raised objections saying that many other things that would
ensure sustainability must be well put in place before the Federal government
can embark on such decision adding that the rule of the free trade law must be
observed as regards this crop so as to allow the forces of demand and supply to
determine market forces of the crop with competitiveness towards quality and
standard without violation of human rights.
Prominent
among such voices was Senator Shehu Sani who has expressed that closing of the
land borders would encourage smuggling pointed that the measure would suffocate
legitimate businesses in the country.
In his
twitter, Sen. Sani has said that relevant security agencies should be able to
tackle the issue rather than shutting the border s. Our layers of security
operative should be able to combat or prevent smuggling without suffocating
legitimate businesses and stifling border communities”
No comments:
Post a Comment